Washington, DC - President Trump’s Administration is working together to improve and streamline environmental reviews for major infrastructure projects.

• Federal agencies are signing the One Federal Decision Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), establishing a coordinated and timely process for environmental reviews of major infrastructure projects.
• The signatories of the MOU have agreed to an unprecedented level of collaboration in the environmental review process and include the:
  • Departments of the Interior, Agriculture, Commerce, Housing and Urban Development, Transportation, Energy, and Homeland Security
  • Environmental Protection Agency
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
  • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
  • Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
  • Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council
• One lead Federal agency will be responsible for navigating each major infrastructure project through the entire Federal environmental review and permitting process.
  • Until now, project sponsors have had to navigate decision-making processes across multiple Federal agencies. Federal agencies will work with the lead agency for a project to develop a single Environmental Impact Statement and sign a single Record of Decision.
  • The lead agency will seek written concurrence from other agencies at important points in the process.
• Federal agencies will follow permitting timetables established by the lead Federal agency, with a goal of completing the process within two years.
  • In the past, Federal agencies were generally not required to follow a comprehensive permitting timetable.
  • Under the MOU, Federal agencies will conduct their review processes at the same time, rather than sequentially, which has led to unnecessary delays.
• The MOU will ensure interagency issues and disputes are elevated and resolved in a timely manner.
  • Previously, interagency disputes could remain unresolved for years.

DELIVERING STREAMLINED DECISION-MAKING: The One Federal Decision MOU follows through on the President’s policy of streamlining inefficient and lengthy environmental reviews.

• The MOU will deliver on the President’s policy of One Federal Decision for major infrastructure projects.
• President Trump’s Executive Order 13807 established a One Federal Decision policy for major infrastructure projects.
  • The Executive Order directed the Office of Management and Budget and the Council on Environmental Quality to develop a framework for implementing One Federal Decision.

CUTTING COSTLY DELAYS:  Inefficient environmental review processes have led to unnecessary delays, depriving our communities of needed infrastructure projects.

• The MOU improves Federal agency cooperation and ensures Federal agencies establish coordinated permitting timetables for major infrastructure projects, cutting down on needless delays.
• Too many important infrastructure projects have been held up for years by the environmental review process.
• The median environmental review completion time for a complex highway project is more than seven years, according to a 2014 Government Accountability Office report.
• The environmental review and permitting process for the Herbert C. Bonner Bridge Replacement Project in North Carolina took more than 20 years.
  • The environmental review process involved numerous studies and interagency disputes and was subject to extensive delays.
  • The original bridge was well past its design life and is now being replaced with a design that can better withstand the harsh coastal environment.
  • The One Federal Decision framework would have allowed for a much more timely environmental review process.
• Loop 202, a critical freeway project which will provide an alternative route of travel around Phoenix, took well over a decade to complete the environmental review process.
  • Loop 202’s environmental review faced numerous setbacks and dragged on for years due to poor communication, no agreed upon timetable, and other issues.
  • The project, which is the largest in Arizona’s history, is finally in the final stages of development.
  • Had One Federal Decision been in place, agencies could have identified and resolved conflicts throughout project development and reduced their impact on project schedules.